Titlebook: Marx, the Body, and Human Nature; John G. Fox Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2015 Alienation.anxiety.body.desir

群居動(dòng)物

Introduction: Evading the Body,about what makes for a fully or truly human life have long been preoccupied with the soul, or will, or other non-corporeal aspects of the self. And, in those debates, the body has often been neglected in the manner of West’s ‘biped’, with our essential nature treated as somehow detached or distant from our bodies.

Munificent

The Promise of the Body,. More than this, I seek to celebrate those joys and moments of exuberance that are too often trivialised as leisure or relief and as shallow and unrevealing. I seek a language that values that pleasure and does not dismiss its promise. To that end, I have explored both the meaning and the potential of Marx’s theory of human nature.

混沌

,Spinoza’s Revolution,rough Spinoza’s work that the debate about human nature shifts from the concept of substance to that of essence — the term Marx used to consider human nature. Spinoza’s influence, however, is not immediately obvious.

抓住他投降

Juvenile

驚惶

Early Influences: Pain and Promise,onsidering particular beings in terms of a feature that provided that being with its permanent, ongoing character notwithstanding observable changes in its properties. Aristotle stands at a central point in this account. His works clearly engage in the traditional debate about the concept of substan

Cytology

expository

Hegel: Wrestling with Desire,out having thoroughly studied and understood the . of [Hegel’s] … .’. However, the extent of this influence has been and continues to be the focus of much debate, as evidenced by the works of Althusser (1996), Arthur (2004b), Colletti (1973), Levine (2012), and Reuten (2000). I argue that an explora

爭(zhēng)論

Feuerbach: Embracing Limitation,orresponded with Feuerbach, holding that ‘there is no other road… to truth and freedom except that leading through the Fire-brook [the Feuer-bach]’ (cited in Hanfi 1972, 41–2). Yet a few short years later, in 1845, Marx wrote his theses on Feuerbach, proclaiming the shortcomings of Feuerbach’s thoug

FAZE

,Marx’s Objective Being,e realities of human misery’ (cited in Wartofsky 1977, 196). Like Feuerbach, Marx’s early works were concerned with the search for such a ‘human language’ and reflected a keen awareness of the difficulty of the task. In 1844, Marx (1975d, 276–7) complained that.However, the difficulties in understan