Titlebook: Marx and Laozi; A Dialectical Synthe James Chambers Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to S

notice

內(nèi)部

Constant

招致

Reading Strategies for Hegel, Marx, and Laozind Laozi). It will be explained that the reading strategy for Laozi is directly opposed to that of Marx because of their divergent approaches: Marx’s works are historicist, essentialist, and humanist and operate within the science of concepts (in a qualified sense), Laozi is anti-historicist, anti-e

Ophthalmoscope

清澈

Hegel’s Metaphilosophy of Idealism account of Hegel’s idealism is essential for this as the controversy that will unfold between Hegel and Laozi in the next chapter will mainly concern idealism. The chapter surveys recent literature on Hegel’s Idealist conception of philosophy to give a clear explanation of his idealism. It will be

etidronate

Hegel’s Interpretation of Laozienuine dialogue between the two, dialogue is circumscribed by Laozi’s rejection of Hegel’s idealist conception of philosophy. The chapter begins by going over some hermeneutic issues involved in Hegel’s own reading of Laozi, situating it in Hegel’s cultural/historical context and Hegel’s idealist/co

Irremediable

An Anti-conceptualist Reconstruction?of Laozihy and how. The interpretation of Hegel’s idealism explained in previous chapters will be used to show that Laozi’s approach represents a way of thinking philosophically which Hegel’s philosophy, despite some points of contact, can neither accommodate nor refute. A Laozi will be constructed who is n

機構

內(nèi)疚

Praxis: Scientific Discursive Employment of Conceptsach’s criticism to scientifically employ Hegel’s logic. Hegel’s hypostatization of the concept was scientifically progressive in that it led to the science of concepts. Marx will be read as correcting Hegel’s hypostatization by giving Hegel’s abstract concepts the content of concrete history. Marx w