Titlebook: Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships; Evidence and Implica Rafal Dudkowski Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable

復雜

書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships被引頻次




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships年度引用




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships讀者反饋




書目名稱Managing Value Co-creation in University-Industry Partnerships讀者反饋學科排名

Harbor

Occlusion

Rafal DudkowskiProvides an overview of processes, policies and management practices which enable successful R&D collaboration.Includes case studies of successful R&D co-creation activities.Provides a framework to un

Lumbar-Spine

要素

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60477-6Value Co-creation; Activity Network; Industry-University Partnerships; Collaboration Processes; Innovati

heart-murmur

Definitions,This chapter introduces the key definitions applied throughout the book.

linear

Objectives of the Study,This chapter deals with the purpose of the study—in particular, it starts with the research questions, next it charts the essential fields of analysis and how this work contributes to both the theory as well as the practice of UIC.

不能和解

machination

Conceptual Synthesis,f cooperation and boundary spanning. The last subchapter delineates the normative accounts of factors for success drawn from the process of Industry–University R&D collaboration of both Telia and Swisscom.

去才蔑視

Principal Contributions and Implications,icular, it outlines the evolution of collaborative Activity Network analyzed through five perspectives of collective knowledge co-creation: ontological, epistemological, functional, historical, and teleological. The final contribution also addresses some of the areas for further research.