找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Making Communism Hermeneutical; Reading Vattimo and Silvia Mazzini,Owen Glyn-Williams Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

[復制鏈接]
樓主: Malinger
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:59:47 | 只看該作者
Response to Robbins may seem, they are the consequence rather than the cause of our “dangerous undertaking.” This underlying danger rests in “the political becoming of hermeneutics”, which is also the title of Robbins’ contribution.
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:19:33 | 只看該作者
Response to Mazzinii Dean), or a problem (Slavoj ?i?ek), has to confront. Jacques Derrida, who was the first to call for a return of communism after the fall of the Soviet Union, also faced this problem when he called for a “New International.”
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:58:49 | 只看該作者
The End of Metaphysics, the Uses and Abuses of Philosophy, and Understanding Just a Little Better: Ology of manifestos is offered and then the question is raised, to what extent we can fit . within this tradition. The chapter also engages a questionable assumption of ., namely the metaphysics of the end, which is announced as the end of metaphysics. This last point is elaborated vis-a-vis a readin
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 00:30:41 | 只看該作者
Response to Mendietae terms. We knew this was going to be a book of political philosophy, but it never occurred to us it would be interpreted as a manifesto or proclamation. If Mendieta is correct, readers will continue to interpret this book in the future. And it is precisely for this future that we have written it. A
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:11:00 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:32:17 | 只看該作者
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:19:00 | 只看該作者
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:40:45 | 只看該作者
Response to Woessner. Unfortunately, too many philosophers today are losing this virtue and becoming so called “specialists,” “experts”, or “technicians.” If Martin Woessner, who was trained as an intellectual historian, embodies this philosophical virtue to the fullest, it is probably thanks to his long-time interest
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:17:58 | 只看該作者
Love’s Law? The Principle of Anarchy in a Weakened Communisme is in the intellectual world what the democracy is in the political world and both can be viewed “as alternative appropriations of the Christian message that love is the only law.” They return to this notion of love further on, referring to a Nietzschean-Christian style, claiming: “Now that God is
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 00:42:18 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 05:50
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
句容市| 富蕴县| 乌什县| 屏东县| 海门市| 开阳县| 衡山县| 松江区| 唐山市| 苍溪县| 杭锦后旗| 准格尔旗| 咸宁市| 炎陵县| 象州县| 嘉定区| 潞城市| 昌平区| 德惠市| 普安县| 朝阳区| 清涧县| 黄冈市| 汕尾市| 雷山县| 改则县| 准格尔旗| 渑池县| 华宁县| 那曲县| 稷山县| 芦溪县| 台江县| 武清区| 长沙县| 松滋市| 文昌市| 安丘市| 金门县| 东港市| 新泰市|