Titlebook: Machine Medical Ethics; Simon Peter van Rysewyk,Matthijs Pontier Book 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Artificial I

Keshan-disease

infinite

2213-8986 s should constrain medical machine conduct? What design features are required? Should machines share responsibility with humans for the ethical consequences of medical actions? How ought clinical relationships 978-3-319-34997-8978-3-319-08108-3Series ISSN 2213-8986 Series E-ISSN 2213-8994

Melanoma

Good Healthcare Is in the “How”: The Quality of Care, the Role of Machines, and the Need for New Skiuire new skills to handle the technology but also and especially new knowing-how to handle .: knowing how to be care-full and caring . the technology. Good care is not about something external called “ethics” but about . things are done in medical and care practices. Machines are welcome if they con

Crohns-disease

低位的人或事

Do Machines Have Prima Facie Duties?l-established practical cases, reaching the same verdict as a prima facie duty-based ethic in the particular health-care case explored by the Andersons (a robot designed to know when to over-ride an elderly patient’s autonomy).

indignant

detach

Having the Final Say: Machine Support of Ethical Decisions of Doctorsthical problems like end-of-life decisions. Here questions of shared responsibility need to be answered: should machine or human have the last say? This chapter explores the question of shared responsibility mainly in ethical decision making in medicine. After addressing the historical development o

發(fā)電機(jī)

擴(kuò)張

Automating Medicine the Ethical Wayation is complex and informative for other fields. If the aviation industry exemplifies the potential benefits, then the Information Technology (IT) industry, particularly AI, highlights the dangers. Since this industry produces the ‘machine’ part of machine medical ethics, it is unfortunately neces

follicular-unit