Titlebook: Ludwig Wittgenstein: Half-Truths and One-and-a-Half-Truths; Jaakko Hintikka Book 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996 MRWCa

媽媽不開心

檢查

etidronate

osteopath

,An Anatomy of Wittgenstein’s Picture Theory,osophy and its history, that is, ideas which not only have several distinguishable ingredients but which are such that they cannot be put together any longer once the difference between the different factors is discovered and recognized. There is an abundance of such concepts and conceptions ripe to

否決

The Idea of Phenomenology in Wittgenstein and Husserl,ese philosophers, the two figuring in my title, Wittgenstein and Husserl, loom particularly large. Over the years I have come to believe that my colleagues are wrong and that we have not fully grasped the import of the philosophy of the likes of Husserl and Wittgenstein. I have also come to believe

亞麻制品

TRUST

Pageant

,Ludwig’s Apple Tree: On the Philosophical Relations between Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, the Vienna Circle, and there are also current views on those relationships that do not bear closer scrutiny. For instance, in the last few decades, it has been fashionable to emphasize the differences between the philosophical views of Ludwig Wittgenstein and those of the members of the Vienna Circ

技術(shù)

,The Original , of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics,stein, the moral agent (and the moral patient). Wittgenstein himself would have agreed. He frequently couched his discussion of philosophical problems in moral or quasi-moral terms. He called Frank Ramsey a bourgeois thinker. He compared mathematicians’ presumed reaction to his criticisms to a patie

預(yù)兆好

,Ludwig Looks at the Necker Cube: The Problem of ‘Seeing as’ as a Clue to Wittgenstein’s Philosophy,hy and of its several stages. In this paper, we shall show that our interpretation is strongly supported by what Wittgenstein says of one particular problem, the problem of .. This problem is seen in its clearest form in ambiguous figures like the Necker Cube. (See the figure in section 2 below.) Th