Titlebook: Ludics, Dialogue and Interaction; PRELUDE Project — 20 Alain Lecomte,Samuel Tron?on Book 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2011 coherence spa

附錄

Relevance and Utility in an Argumentative Framework: An Application to the Accommodation of Discouranguage. One can think of at least three possible positions with respect to this issue:.We will focus in our paper on positions (1) and (3). A plausible candidate for a linguistic phenomenon that can be successfully modeled by a subset of game-theory is . (cf. Ducrot (1980)). Argumentation concerns

inveigh

The Geometry and Algebra of Commitment,amiliar in jurisprudence. We argue that the formal study of commitment in this setting can contribute new insights to the analysis of a large variety of communicative situations relevant to formal pragmatics.

PUT

Compliance,ion towards resolving a given issue in a cooperative dialogue that is geared towards the exchange of information. We assume that such a contribution may consist in (partially) resolving the issue, or in raising an easier to answer sub-issue (cf. Roberts, 1996). Thus, among other things, compliance w

entreat

The Calculus of Responsibility and Commitment,the typed lambda calculus (hereafter TLC) and certain of its extensions have been the linguists’ tool of choice for representing the meanings of NL expressions. But starting around the turn of the millenium, motivated by a range of linguistic phenomena collectively known as . phenomena, logical gram

NEX

名義上

Ontologies and Coherence Spaces, “representatives” known as . [3] – thanks to the exchange of “l(fā)abelled” data. It is clearly something more complex and more interesting than today’s Web, which allows only for the exchange of files and “raw” data that machines simply display on a monitor.

嚴(yán)厲譴責(zé)

induct

Ludics, Dialogue and Interaction978-3-642-19211-1Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

occurrence

Ludics and Rhetorics,In this paper, we give some illustrations of the expressive power of Ludics with regards to some well known problems often regrouped under the label of Rhetorics. Nevertheless our way of considering Rhetorics encompasses many questions which have been put nowadays in Semantics and Pragmatics.

背叛者

On the Meaning of Focalization,In this paper, we use Girard’s ludics to analyze focalization, a fundamental property of the proof theory of linear logic. In particular, we show how focalization can be realized interactively thanks to suitable section-retraction pairs between semantical types.