Titlebook: Loyalty to the Monarchy in Late Medieval and Early Modern Britain, c.1400-1688; Matthew Ward,Matthew Hefferan Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if

Annotate

拱形大橋

無動(dòng)于衷

做事過頭

遺忘

‘We have a good king and our imaginations ought to be good to him’: Divided Loyalties Forced on Easte royally appointed sheriffs in the East Midlands, facing clear and obvious conflicts of loyalty between their local and national interests, and on the interpretation by judges of the concept of observance of the rule of law, where it may conflict with their perceived or anticipated loyalty to the c

前面

Loyalty and Insecurity in Charles II’s Virginiaies formulated by the king and parliament..The chapter concludes that Charles II viewed colonists as second-class subjects who were not entitled to the same prerogative relief from oppressive statutes that deserving English merchants and mariners had often received. The crown demanded that colonists

Glaci冰

Book 2020ction dissects the role that the concept of loyalty played during and after the Civil Wars, looking at how divergent groups navigated this turbulent period and examining the ways in which loyalty could be used as a means of surviving the upheaval..

Expressly

Root494

Loyalty to the Monarchy in Late Medieval and Early Modern Britain, c.1400-1688

值得

Loyalty to the Monarchy in Late Medieval and Early Modern Britain, c.1400-1688978-3-030-37767-0