Titlebook: Logic Program Synthesis and Transformation; Proceedings of LOPST Yves Deville (Chair) Conference proceedings 1994 British Computer Society

Obsequious

Inductive Synthesis of Logic Programs and Inductive Logic Programming, methods (Shapiro’s MIS and Plotkin’s least general generalizations) which have set the foundations of the field and inspired more recent top-down and bottom-up approaches, respectively. Recent research has suggested that practical program induction requires a hypothesis space which is restricted a

完成才會(huì)征服

Induction of Prolog programs with Markus,he current version of the system uses as its basis ’covering’ paradigm (also used by some other systems, e.g. Quinlan’s .). Within this paradigm, the development of single program clauses is performed by iterative deepening search of optimally generated refinement graphs (also used in Shapiro’s Mode

免費(fèi)

陶醉

Guiding Synthesis Proofs,yster/CLAM system, designed for a functional context, we developed some proof “critics” to solve the cases in which those methods are blocked in a relational context. The application of those methods and proof critics is illustrated by an example, the delete predicate synthesis.

CLOWN

Combining Prolog Programs in a Techniques Editing System (Abstract),and tools embodying it are easily implemented. Based upon this methodology, we have developed [VVVR93] a system to construct modular large-scale Prolog programs using a techniques editing system and program combination. This integrated environment allows users to:

accessory

控制

The Power of Partial Evaluation,ell-designed reimplementation of the theorem prover. We take the clausal theorem prover given by Poole and Goebel in [17], and show that partial evaluation of this prover (written as a meta-program) with respect to some object theory, does not give the required specialisation. We then give a version

stressors

SMART

Synthesis of Programs from Unfold/Fold Proofs,describe a program transformation method based on the . which can be used for proving that a given first order equivalence formula of the form: ?X (?Y F(X,Y) ? ?Z G(X,Z)), where F and G are conjunctions of atoms, is true in the least Herbrand model of a given program. Equivalence formulas of that fo

鞏固