Titlebook: Literature, Science, and a New Humanities; Jonathan Gottschall Book 2008 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2008 Case S

squamous-cell

書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities被引頻次




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities年度引用




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities讀者反饋




書目名稱Literature, Science, and a New Humanities讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

不要嚴(yán)酷

憤怒歷史

The “Beauty Myth” is no Mythning overlapping samples of folktales, so that perhaps 10–15 percent of the entire sample would have been coded by all participants, would have provided a more confident indicator of the reliability of the findings as a whole. Second, we should have focused on a smaller number of distinct culture ar

exclamation

Introduction: Shrinking Possibility Spacee—fret over some of the following indicators. Decades of downward trends in undergraduate humanities enrollees and majors mean that the humanities generally, and literary study specifically, “have become a less and less significant part of higher education” (Kernan 1997, 5). Funding trends among pri

phytochemicals

Catheter

套索

咯咯笑

Glaci冰

CRANK