Titlebook: Literature and the Global Contemporary; Sarah Brouillette,Mathias Nilges,Emilio Sauri Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Auth

Guileless

Book 2017rature, and thus of contemporary global literatures. It opens up the concept of the contemporary for comparative study by unlocking its temporal, logical, political, and ultimately aesthetic and literary complexity..

清楚

,Capitalism’s Long Spiral: Periodicity, Temporality and the Global Contemporary in World Literature,ls of false universality and determinism, attempting to revitalize the possibilities for positive freedom through struggle in the present. Saturated with apprehension of a “signal crisis” of neoliberal capitalism, they imagine the contemporary as a spectrum that may or may not be a transit point to

背叛者

,The Landowner’s Ghosts: Realism and Financialization in Contemporary Latin American Fiction,ntemporary through longer histories linking landowning oligarchies, anti-communist counterinsurgencies, and neoliberal transitions toward privatization and finance capitalism. While landowning oligarchies were largely defeated by national development projects, including land reform and socialist rev

發(fā)生

HERTZ

清洗

#YOLO,rest in relation to the notion that life is only really lived “on the edge,” so we should be always pushing ourselves to the absolute limit, having “peak experiences,” or being “in the zone.” I suggest that, instead of stopping at the common interpretation of this “edgework” as manifesting the desir

Encumber

,Capitalism’s Long Spiral: Periodicity, Temporality and the Global Contemporary in World Literature,in contemporary world literature. I argue that the aesthetics of globalist literatures such as David Mitchell’s . or Simon Ings’ . which embody paralyzing neoliberal conceptions of empty time or determinist causality, should be read as symptomatic. In contrast, I contend that counter-hegemonic works

maroon

CREEK

損壞

Periodizing the Anglophone African Novel: Location(s) in a Transnational Literary Marketplace,ational literary market. Beginning from the critical preponderance of the oft-used “generational paradigm” for contemporary Anglophone African literature, it goes on to locate the urge to periodize African writing within a larger discursive apparatus that transforms space into time, drawing on a ser