Titlebook: Literary Translation; Redrawing the Bounda Jean Boase-Beier,Antoinette Fawcett,Philip Wilson Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Ma

preservative

,Dialogic Spaces and Literary Resonances in the French Translation of A. S. Byatt’s Autobiographicalher stories]. It opens with a preface, written by Byatt and translated by Chevalier himself, which situates the translation at the very heart of the receiving culture, a culture dominated by a . [literary quarrel] between autobiography, as first theorized by Philippe Lejeune in 1971, and ‘a(chǎn)utofictio

arrhythmic

obnoxious

Translation in Sixteenth-Century English Manuals for the Teaching of Foreign Languages, vehicles of culture and knowledge able to perform the same function as Latin, Europe’s lingua franca for many centuries. The progression of the struggle between Latin and vernacular languages can be illustrated, for instance, in the sphere of diplomatic international relations. If during the first

Asseverate

Iconic Motivation in Translation: Where Non-Fiction Meets Poetry?,aning’ (Fischer and N?nny 1999), has attracted a lot of interest in the last two decades. As the word ‘a(chǎn)nalogies’ suggests, the notion of ‘similarity’, as defined by the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce (1991) and much later by Roman Jakobson (1965/1990), is seminal, underlying the repres

accrete

Genome

Esophagitis

What Does Literary Translation Bring to an Understanding of Postcolonial Cultural Perceptions? On tg subjects of research from the perspective of postcolonial studies. This chapter focuses on the case of literary translation, suggesting that the sustained study of translations and the reception of postcolonial literature contribute to mapping out the discourses that surround postcolonial cultures

tenuous

簡潔

On the Work of Philosopher-Translators, gives rise to two principal lines of enquiry: into the philosophy of translation and the translation of philosophy. Neither has been well served by the secondary literature, and leading reference works (for example: Craig 1998; Malmkj?r and Windle 2011; Snell-Hornby et al. 1999; Zalta 2013) routine

召集

Translation and Holocaust Testimonies: a Matter for Holocaust Studies or Translation Studies?,tion to translation and its effects might threaten to call into question many of the structuring assumptions of the disciplines that are loosely grouped together under the label Holocaust studies. I will argue here that much of the current discussion of the translation of Holocaust testimonies serve