Titlebook: Linguistic Analysis and Phenomenology; Wolfe Mays (Reader in Philosophy, Editor of ‘The J Book 1972 The Royal Institute of Philosophy 1972

陶醉

A Reply to ‘A Person’s Future and the Mind—Body Problem’ritish philosophy (e.g. the analysis of the logical priority of the concept of ‘person’) with those of Continental philosophy (e.g. the more phenomenological analysis of the future-dimension of human existence).

項目

Freedom and DeterminismI . to discuss the following statement by Maine de Biran, which I think represents quite fairly his position on freedom:

陪審團

形上升才刺激

The Person: Issues and Questions is primarily concerned with refuting the Cartesian and neo-Cartesian dualism of the two substances or what he calls the ‘two persons’ view, present, he believes, in both the Anglo-Saxon and the phenomenological traditions in spite of appearances, Sartre being mentioned specifically in the latter connection.

Precursor

A Person’s Future and the Mind-Body Problem this paper I shall attempt to throw light on the role of the concept of future in our understanding of the notion of personal identity, which I hope will help to do something to solve some difficulties in the mind—body problem.

說笑

手銬

Overview: This volume contains the proceedings of the six symposia of the ‘Philosophers into Europe‘ conference held under he joint auspices of the Royal Institute of Philosophy and the British Society for Phenomenology at the University of Southampton in September 1969.978-1-349-01217-6978-1-349-01215-2

兇殘

e rate of return on the market portfolio. This relation is the so-called . (CAPM). CAPM implicitly assumes that the returns on risky assets depend on a single market factor. Ross (1976) proposed a multifactor model for the behavior of asset prices in capital markets, which is called the . (APT).

支形吊燈

FAZE