Titlebook: Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics; Gerben Meynen Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), unde

遮陽傘

書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics被引頻次




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics年度引用




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics讀者反饋




書目名稱Legal Insanity: Explorations in Psychiatry, Law, and Ethics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Antecedent

PON

大門在匯總

浮雕寶石

expansive

Book 2016e analyzed and recommendations for forensic psychiatric and legal practice are offered. Many legal systems have an insanity defense, in one form or another. Still, it remains unclear exactly when and why mental disorders affect a person’s moral or criminal responsibility. Questions addressed in this

Graphite

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44721-6criminial responsibility; diminished guilt due to mental disorder; forensic psychiatry; insanity; insani

Hearten

Competent and Compromised Decision-Making,In this chapter, we further explore the grounds for legal insanity, using two partially related approaches to the impact mental disorders have on a defendant’s responsibility. The link between the approaches is that decision-making is central to both of them.

hyperuricemia

FLAG

Concluding Observations on the Present and Future of Insanity,Legal insanity is an intensely debated element of criminal law. Not just the insanity defense as such has been challenged, but also its components and related issues have given rise to numerous controversies and arguments. Lawyers, psychologists, psychiatrists, ethicists, and, increasingly, neuroscientists are participating in these debates.