Titlebook: Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism; Francis J. Bremer Book 2015 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2015 Purita

警察在苦笑

書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism被引頻次




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism年度引用




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism讀者反饋




書目名稱Lay Empowerment and the Development of Puritanism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

NAG

不出名

Thinking of the Laity in the English Reformation,ing. But the fact remains that the impetus against the right of the papacy to define doctrine and practice in the Catholic Church came from a layman who placed his own interpretation of a key text in Leviticus above that of the pope and then sought learned opinion to support his position. Equally im

引起痛苦

Mobile

痛恨

報(bào)復(fù)

Obstreperous

,The Role of the Laity in England’s Puritan Revolution, would be upon the puritan New World adventure certainly appeared to be the case in the late 1630s and early 1640s. The Atlantic debate over the nature and value of the colonial system became of even greater relevance as conflict between Charles I and his subjects broke out in England and the Long P

自作多情

Varieties of Lay Enthusiasm in New England and England,itself of what most puritans branded heresies.. John Coffey has pointed out that “Presbyterians and Congregationalists, General and Particular Baptists, Seekers and Fifth Monarchists, Ranters and Quakers all emerged from the intense religious substructure of the godly.”. Prophesyings, introspection

legacy

,Responding to the Challenges of Diversity, 1640–60,ere focused on the extraordinary expressions of lay involvement in religion during the decades of England’s Interregnum. In addition to offering their own advice on how their native land should be reformed, the colonists had to deal with the charge that it was New England that was the source of the