Titlebook: Law and Economics; Nicholas Mercuro (Professor of Economics) Book 1989 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989 Institution.Public Choice.conflict.

轉(zhuǎn)向

Law and Economics: An Institutional Perspective,ion of legal institutions of economic significance. This has been an interest of classical political economy since its inception. The contemporary institutional approach has its roots in the work of such economists as Henry Carter Adams on economics and jurisprudence [1], Richard T. Ely on the role

TRACE

Substance

jungle

Property Rights and Choice,ian [1]. Abetted by seminal articles on transaction and information costs by Ronald H. Coase and George J. Stigler [2], this line of inquiry attracted other scholars and, by the mid 1970s, had generated a substantial and growing body of theoretical and empirical research [3].

Ostrich

儲(chǔ)備

Law and Economics: Paradigm, Politics, or Philosophy,t how the world ought to be evaluated? Is the ultimate aim scientific, political, or philosophical? Much of the controversy concerning the place of economics in law and the place of law in economics reduces to a debate over the basic goals of those who attempt interdisciplinary work. Are they social

異端

MAG

The Law and Economics and Critical Legal Studies Movements in American Law,d welfare economics, to systematically describe, reformulate, and critique nearly every aspect of law and the legal system. A central claim of the new law and economics is that the entire legal system can be analyzed and reformed through the application of a relatively small number of fundamental economic concepts [1].

受辱

Law and Economics: Settled Issues and Open Questions, 1960s. But I think that it is fair to say that law and economics was born and brought to adolescence in the course of a single decade, the 1970s. Very few innovations in economic or legal scholarship of the recent past have grown so rapidly.

脫落