Titlebook: Language of the Revolution; The Discourse of Ant Eugen Wohl,Elena P?curar Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

節(jié)省

Compromise or Survival: Adapting the Religious Discourse and the Topics Covered in Publications of tbjected to severe trials. Many priests and lay members were imprisoned for preaching and confessing the faith, some dioceses were abolished, significant parts of the Church property were nationalised, and teaching religion in schools was banned. Atheism was promoted in the education of the youth and

nugatory

colony

The Language of Inner Freedom for Dissent: Müller and Liiceanu Before and After the Revolution the language of the oppressors, but which did not speak out against the regime—can be considered dissident. For Liiceanu they can, their resistance consists in preserving the purity of language. For Müller they cannot, we resist by tearing holes in language. This chapter will examine the disagreeme

幼稚

The Rhetoric of Albanian Insurgency: Communism and Anti-Communism in Kosovo their regionalist, independentist, or nationalist interests. Part of the analysis discusses the multi-textualism of the Kosovo-Albanian handling of language, ties it to their different attempts at insurgencies and focuses on the use of pro-communist and anti-communist rhetorical devices. Even when

peritonitis

fidelity

禁止

起皺紋

Surviving the Change, Adjusting the Language. Romanian Writers in the Cultural Media, December 1989–ts that had compelled the literary discourse to disguise itself as a hybrid socio-political one were overturned, a revisiting and redefining of the writers’ position in society became necessary. This chapter looks into the complex changes that occurred within the post-revolutionary literary field du

樸素

蘆筍

Staging Communism in Romania: Language, Propaganda, Memory in Caryl Churchill’s , and Matei Vi?niec’ds the traumas inflicted by the totalitarian regime. The staging of communism in Caryl Churchill’s . and Matei Vi?niec’s . is reconsidered through the lens of memory and history wherein language is both an essential tool of cultural production during the regime and a means of contesting the absurdit