Titlebook: Language and Power in Court; A Linguistic Analysi Janet Cotterill Book 2003 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

HUMID

Interaction in The Criminal Trial: Participants and Processes, Roles and Relationships, fact, coupled with the highly purposive nature of courtroom talk, means that many of the properties of this specialised communicative setting are determined by the hierarchies and power relations in the courtroom context.

Consequence

刀鋒

,‘If It Doesn’t Fit, You Must Acquit’: Reframing the Story through Metaphorical Choice in the Closinl. Following the elicitation of testimony from all the witnesses, human and physical, lawyers from both sides have a further, and final, opportunity to present a persuasive summary of the evidence in the . before the jury retire to consider its verdict.

無思維能力

Diatribe

http://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/581054.jpg

憲法沒有

Bereavement

,Introduction — A Crime Chronology: The Murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman,ity. The dog led the man to 875 South Bundy, once the marital home of ex-American footballer Orenthal James (O.J.) Simpson and Nicole Brown Simpson, and now occupied by Nicole and their two young children.

鎮(zhèn)痛劑

Trial by Jury: Legal Frameworks and Linguistic Consequences,eers is enshrined in the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution. It has been calculated that every year in the United States, approximately three million jurors serve in some 300,000 cases, and that 85 per cent of the world’s jury trials take place in the United States (Abraham 1998).

indigenous

微枝末節(jié)

Mind the Gap: Negotiating Power, Knowledge and Status in Expert Witness Testimony,es on the role of one specific type of witness—the expert—and analyses the particular set of interactional dynamics and the relative distribution of knowledge and expertise which characterise expert witness testimony. These phenomena will be discussed in the context of and exemplified by experts in the Simpson trial.