Titlebook: Knowledge and the Known; Historical Perspecti Jaakko Hintikka Book 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991 Aristotle.Immanuel Kant.Kant.Plato.

fulcrum

HPA533

紳士

Enteropathic

Gorilla

Inference or Performance?,ave historically or topically. A perusal of the relevant literature fails to satisfy this expectation, however. After hundreds of discussions of Descartes’s famed principle we still do not seem to have any way of expressing his alleged insight in terms which would be general and precise enough to en

外觀

失望昨天

harangue

,‘Dinge An Sich’ Revisited,ey to be understood ontologically, as a genuine class of entities, or is all the talk . merely an epistemological ., an oblique illustration of the necessity of considering the objects of our knowledge qua objects of the operations which we use in gaining information of them and which inevitably als

callous

Knowledge by Acquaintance-Individuation by Acquaintance,f what Russell says on this topic as being familiar enough.. What is not equally clear is how Russell’s doctrine is to be understood and evaluated. At least this was not clear to myself before I came upon some ideas in the semantics of propositional attitudes which suddenly made the logic of Russell

一窩小鳥(niǎo)