Titlebook: Knowledge and Action; Peter Meusburger,Benno Werlen,Laura Suarsana Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

男生戴手銬

reject

Hamper

Action, Knowledge, and Social Relations of Space,proaches in recent decades has creatively shifted the focus from spatial representation to the actions and practices of geography-making. This endeavor implies an action- or practice-centered perspective. But what does this perspective imply about the status of space? However, this question was fore

BLINK

Rationality and Discursive Articulation in Place-Making,praxis theory. Action-theoretic approaches rest on the assumption of the effectivity of various kinds of rational and deliberative decision-making and actions. Proponents of poststructuralist approaches, their critical stance notwithstanding, often tend to refrain from deliberative interventions and

overshadow

Thought-in-Action/Action-in-Thought,nto a concoction of material things and social relations—“Let there be…: and there [is],” creativity effectively a speech act, understanding a power-filled exercise in translation. The lessons learned take the author back first to central place theory and its role in the spatial organization of the

假

Jacket

總

價值在貶值

How Representations of Knowledge Shape Actions,es they can refer to convenient descriptions of actions and their consequences—such as a medicine’s accompanying information of possible side effects and their probabilities. People thereby make decisions from description. However, when deciding whether to back up their computer hard drive, cross a

Hay-Fever

Reflection and Impulse as Determinants of Human Behavior, of actions planned by reflective, deliberate thought and actions caused by spontaneous impulses. Building on existing theories of rational thought, impulse, impulse control, and implicit attitudes, they propose an integration of this research and its incorporation into the RIM’s dual-process struct