Titlebook: Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning; Henry E. Kyburg,Ronald P. Loui,Greg N. Carlson Book 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers 199

DEIGN

書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning被引頻次




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning年度引用




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning讀者反饋




書目名稱Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

者變

GEON

Book 1990ssing systems of all kinds, no matter whether human, (other) ani- mal, or machine. Its scope is intended to span the full range of interests from classical problems in the philosophy of mind and philosophical psy- chology through issues in cognitive psychology and sociobiology (concerning the mental

hereditary

聚集

0924-0780 ata- processing systems of all kinds, no matter whether human, (other) ani- mal, or machine. Its scope is intended to span the full range of interests from classical problems in the philosophy of mind and philosophical psy- chology through issues in cognitive psychology and sociobiology (concerning

雄偉

Belief Revision, Non-Monotonic Reasoning, and the Ramsey Testiefs in light of new information; the . states that an agent should not give up old beliefs when revising his or her beliefs to accommodate new information unless the new information contradicts the old beliefs. Faced with a choice between these principles, G?rdenfors tentatively argues for giving up the Ramsey rule.

Subdue

Jeffrey’s Rule, Passage of Experience, and ,-Bayesianismugh the two have different meanings in human discourse. Likewise, judgements about dependencies must be extracted from judgments about probabilities; there is no way to ascertain the independence of A and . unless . also contains the information necessary for computing .(.), .(.) and .(., .).

LATER

Seeing To it That: A Canonical Form for Agentives honed linguistic resource that Austin, and other philosophers, have realized to be necessary. We think that the most promising path to a deeper understanding of an agent making a choice among alternatives that lead to action is to augment the language with a class of sentences whose fundamental syn

ARENA

Book 1990igence. These difficulties fall into four principal areas: defeasible reasoning (including the frame problem as apart), ordinary language (and the representation prob- lems that it generates), the revision of beliefs (and its rules of inference), and knowledge representation (and the logical problem

META

churches and the roles of women as social innovators. This unique multi-ethnic approach illuminates overlooked dimensions of the immigrant experience in the American Midwest.978-3-030-08775-3978-3-319-78738-1