Titlebook: Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good; Virtue, Happiness, a Roe Fremstedal Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

調(diào)停

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

TRUST

Introduction,ns between moral and religious hope, secular and religious ethics as well as human and divine agency. It emphasizes not only ethics and religious faith but also the central role hope plays for moral agency and religiousness, and it shows how Kierkegaard’s critique of Kantian autonomy anticipates contemporary discussions in metaethics.

公司

Religious Hope: Moral Agency and the Expectancy of the Good,erkegaard.. This chapter tries to remedy this omission by showing how Kant and Kierkegaard sketched — albeit in different ways — ambitious and interesting accounts of hope. This chapter starts with Kierkegaard since his approach is more traditional than Kant’s.

acheon

Religion and Metaethics: Divine Commands and Autonomy as the Source of Moral Obligations,lies better to romantic and constructivist versions of Kantianism than realist versions of Kantianism or even Kant himself. Finally, Kierkegaard’s critique of Kantian autonomy gives us some insight into Kierkegaard’s sources, indicating that Kierkegaard was influenced by Kant’s immediate successors in Germany.

olfction

項(xiàng)目

The Moral Argument for the Existence of God and Immortality: Natural Theology and Divine Revelationst good by being virtuous, although we are not capable of realizing it completely, since the highest good does not depend on our efforts alone.. If the highest good represents a purpose we are obliged to promote, this leads to the following problems. First, morality or virtue is undermined by our tendency (.) to evil. Beiser summarizes:

新陳代謝

The Highest Good: Virtue, Happiness, and the Kingdom of God,erkegaard, it represents the full realization of ethical principles (ideality) in reality and an overcoming of the conflict between the different elements of the synthesis structure (necessity and freedom, finitude and infinitude, and so on).

chandel

978-1-349-49462-0Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2014

cumulative

Overview: Kierkegaard and Kant on Radical Evil and the Highest Good is a major study of Kierkegaard‘s relation to Kant that gives a comprehensive account of radical evil and the highest good, two controversial doctrines with important consequences for ethics and religion.978-1-349-49462-0978-1-137-44088-4

Decongestant