Titlebook: Khrushchev and Khrushchevism; Martin McCauley (Senior Lecturer in Soviet and Eas Book 1987 School of Slavonic and East European Studies, U

可能性

協(xié)迫

入會(huì)

Frank K. Robertse our part if we have clari?ed the past. (Erikson, 1968, pp. 30–31). The scope of time ahead which in?uences present behavior, and is therefore to be regarded as part of the present life-space, increases during development. This change in time perspective is one of the most fundamental facts of deve

敵手

e our part if we have clari?ed the past. (Erikson, 1968, pp. 30–31). The scope of time ahead which in?uences present behavior, and is therefore to be regarded as part of the present life-space, increases during development. This change in time perspective is one of the most fundamental facts of deve

Concerto

TAP

Khrushchev as Leader, Minister was Chairman of the USSR Council of Ministers but he was only a secretary of the Central Committee (CC) of the CPSU. Hence it was not clear how anyone could become head of the CPSU; there was no office which formally conferred on the incumbent that position. Should anyone, however, wish to

Fluctuate

Khrushchev and Systemic Development,eader. Such a focus is understandable. The prominent role played by Lenin both in the founding of the regime and in its early years and the dominating position of Stalin encouraged a view of Soviet politics that was leader-centred. The greyness of much of the institutional arena reinforced this focu

名詞

CESS

Industry,strial output in 1946 was inevitably adversely affected by reconversion to peacetime industry and by the need to repair war damage, as well as by shortage of food. So when Stalin set out some targets, to be achieved in three quinquennia, i.e. by 1960, they must have seemed overambitious. And yet…

表示問(wèn)

Science, Technology and Innovation,ccount of developments in the period is to be found in the OECD study . (Zaleski ., 1969) and a number of recent studies examine the changes in the USSR Academy of Sciences in this period (Lowenhardt, 1982: pp. 127–94; Vucinich, 1984) and the relationship between politics and technology (Parrott 198