Titlebook: Keynes: Philosophy, Economics and Politics; The Philosophical Fo R. M. O’Donnell Book 1989 R. M. ODonnell 1989 economics.John Maynard Keyne

逃避系列單詞

Monotonous

摻假

Epistemologyrieties of rationalism, and Keynes’s own phrase ‘Cambridge rationalism’ might conveniently be used to distinguish his from other versions. Some may prefer the label intuitionist, but little hangs on the difference provided it is understood in a rationalist context. My basic thesis, epistemologically

painkillers

Practical Reason and Ethicsas highly practically oriented is well known. His practical side is constantly stressed by E.A.G. Robinson, for instance, who regarded him as ‘a(chǎn)lways in the ultimate a man of action’ (1975 p. 12). Indeed, some economists have even suggested that his major contributions were practical rather than the

泥土謙卑

Philosophy After 1921ontribution. This was certainly intended; he had had enough of the rigours of philosophical logic and now sought to devote himself primarily to less demanding subjects such as economics.. In a draft preface to the . he declared: ‘I shall write no more philosophy, having reached a time of life when t

Dissonance

Philosophy and Economics: Some General Connectionsis thought. What happens when a philosopher with articulated views on rationality, logic, probability, epistemology and ethics engages with economics, politics and social policy? How do the various streams of thought interact in the one mind — are there continuities and appropriations, ruptures and

LARK

水獺

Heart-Attack

The , I: The Dye of Expectationsinctive approach to behaviour and rationality. Several questions are involved here. What part does the cluster of concepts centred on expectations and uncertainty play in the .? How significant is their role in the Keynesian revolution? What theoretical basis exists for the .’s account of rational b

phlegm

The , II: Behaviour and Rationality in the interpretation of the . Did Keynes base his major economic work on a theory of rational behaviour, or did he assume agent irrationality? What are the differences between Keynes’s treatment of uncertainty and expectations and that of Neoclassicism? What role do probabilities play in his analy