Titlebook: Kelsenian Legal Science and the Nature of Law; Peter Langford,Ian Bryan,John McGarry Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 L

污穢

獨(dú)白

CANE

Natural Law and the Nature of Law: Kelsen’s Paradox be held to presuppose a “nature of law” whose criteria lead to transcendence with respect to positive law, even though it is not its purpose. The difficulty facing the pure theory of law is: to be absolutely dependent on its object, in a manner analogous to the physico-chemical sciences, and, as a

相互影響

Natural Law Systematics: Is There a ‘Grundnorm’ in Natural Law? a “basic norm” (.) formed the basis for a purely scientific systematization of legal norms. Kelsen constructed the outlines for his legal doctrine in clear opposition to natural law theory. The latter was, in Kelsen’s view, a metaphysical legal order, that continued to influence legal science, desp

突變

ILEUM

黃瓜

Hans Kelsen and Practical Reasonral law doctrine. Admitting that a practical use of reason is legitimate, namely, that there is a possible connection between intellect and will, would mean destroying the whole foundation of the scientific undertaking of the Pure Theory of law and its conception of the legal norm, which is its cent

generic

懶惰民族

Folklore