Titlebook: Keith Lehrer; Radu J. Bogdan Book 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1981 determinism.epistemology.freedom.liberty.logi

hypotension

Lehrer on Evidence, Induction and Acceptance all in one place. Rather, he has developed and sharpened the theory in about a score of papers in various journals and books over the past dozen years or so. So, in this paper I will try to bring together the scattered elements of Lehrer’s theory in such a way that the comprehensive and systematic character of the theory stands out.

Palliation

下級(jí)

Lehrer, Consensus and Science: The Empiricist Watershednsensus, read as rational inter-subjective agreement, is at the very core of the epistemic functioning of science. On this doctrine, any adequate account of the epistemic capacities of science is . an account of how reaching rational consensus is unavoidable for rational agents.

燦爛

Replies for example. I have replied as well as I can to these arguments in my contribution to this volume. I recommend to the reader that he study Walton’s essay to find the arguments of my critics most cogently formulated.

閃光你我

Self-Profile a distinguished academic in his native country, Guatemala. I remember very distinctly what question it was that sparked my curiosity and settled my choice of career. We were reading . by Voltaire. Juarez Paz, who was studying emotivism in preparation for his dissertation, suggested that when Panglo

flaunt

座右銘

Lehrer on Evidence, Induction and Acceptanceit helps to shed considerable light on, other problem areas of philosophy and science. However, his theory has not been presented all in one piece and all in one place. Rather, he has developed and sharpened the theory in about a score of papers in various journals and books over the past dozen year

健談

Onerous

Lehrer, Consensus and Science: The Empiricist Watershedto coerce rational inter-subjective agreement on knowledge claims through the pursuit of the empirical, experimental method. From this perspective, consensus, read as rational inter-subjective agreement, is at the very core of the epistemic functioning of science. On this doctrine, any adequate acco

炸壞