Titlebook: Kazimierz Opa?ek Selected Papers in Legal Philosophy; Jan Woleński Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 discourse.natu

Coordinate

bypass

notion

金盤是高原

斜坡

Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophye specific traits and mutual relations of particular legal disciplines, as well as on the relations of the study of law to non-legal disciplines, mainly to philosophy and social sciences. Inquiries on these problems were undertaken both in the Western and in the Socialist science, not only in numero

充氣球

Some Problems of the Theory of Normspressing commands, prohibitions, permissions, wishes, advice, approval, disapproval, and the like. All these statements have the same general kind of meaning characterized by R. Carnap as “the optative meaning”., and the function of influencing behaviour. In connection with this group of statements

投射

The Problem of “Directive Meaning”ometimes “norms”, sometimes “rules”, “directives” etc. The semantic relations of these terms are not clear and precise: hence the recurrent attempts at defining and correlating them as well as at establishing further terminology for the classification of “norms”, “rules”, or “directives”. For the pu

善于

The Problem of the Existence of the Normh the philosophical foundations of deontic logic.. The approach to the norm is different in this instance from the most frequent one in legal theory, and metaethics. The point at issue is not to investigate the logical-semantic properties of the norm (normally treated in the last-mentioned-disciplin

BLAND

On the Logical-Semantic Structure of Directives, rules (e.g., of games), and the like.. One would be tempted to say that they are“directive statements”, having the same general kind of meaning (the “directive meaning”).. The directives, as we see, are variously termed: a fact testifying to their differentiation. The terms mentioned above are, ho

背信