Titlebook: Kantianism for Animals; A Radical Kantian An Nico Dario Müller Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2022 Anima

collagenase

Animal Ethics and the Philosophical Canon: A Proposalqual philosophical footing. The chapter proposes that animal ethicists should take this approach to other figures from the history of philosophy, particularly if their views explicitly or implicitly exclude animals from moral concern.

倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn)

Inscrutable

轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn)

opalescence

Is the Formula of Humanity the Problem?f autonomous willing rather than a substantive moral principle. The boundary of moral concern is fixed by an entirely different part of Kant’s ethical system, namely his doctrine of obligatory ends. The chapter advocates devoting more attention to the question how animals can be included in this part of Kant’s thought.

睨視

Animals and the ‘Directionality’ of Dutiescount for the directionality of duties in terms of their content rather than their form. Duties to others are simply duties that concern others in a particular way. This view eliminates all second-personal authority from Kant’s ethics. The chapter discusses the implications of this purely ‘first-personal’ view of interpersonal obligation.

BOON

Kantian Moral Patients Without Practical Reason?instrumentally rational pursuers of their own happiness. Animals are neither, according to Kant. The chapter proposes amendments to the Kantian ethical framework to resolve these difficulties. It also details Kant’s views on instinct as a driver of animal behaviour, which puts them in contrast with rational agents.

最有利

反叛者

gentle

A Kantian Argument Against Eating Animals. This duty derives from the obligatory end of our own moral perfection. As the chapter explains, this argument prohibits commodification and treating deceased others as foodstuffs, but not necessarily all forms of eating others. For instance, cannibalism as part of a grieving practice is not prohibited by the argument.