Titlebook: Kant on Maxims and Moral Motivation; A New Interpretation Peter Herissone-Kelly Book 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018 Kant moral ph

悶熱

HEED

MERIT

Maxims of Actiond clarifying the senses in which they are subjective, general, and propositions. Along the way, I offer an introductory explanation of Kant’s claim that an incentive is unable to determine the will, except in so far as it has been incorporated into a maxim. Those tasks completed, I set out to determ

王得到

Maxims, Ends, and Incentivestrary amongst commentators, maxims of action do not contain essential references either to ends or to incentives as proper constituents; rather, ends and incentives function as what I call ‘conative correlates’ of maxims. In other words, wherever an agent has a maxim M., she has a related end and in

刺耳

討好女人

Maxims and Reasons at all. It also aims to go some way towards demonstrating that we can say the same thing about the problem of experiential incongruence. I argue for a novel account of what it is to have a maxim of action, or, as I shall put it, of the ‘possession conditions’ of a maxim of action. That account has

Cumbersome

Incentives, Practical Aspects, and Bare Situational Reasonsory reasons. That is, incentive reasons are reasons . an agent comes to take the obtaining of an F-type situation as a reason to Φ, rather than factors that causally explain an agent’s viewing F-type situations in that way. Having established this much, I go on to offer experientially congruent acco

良心

gene-therapy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05572-1Kant moral philosophy; Kant theory of action; Kant rational agency; Kant’s maxims; Moral psychology; Mora

LAP

Peter Herissone-KellyIs an in-depth and carefully argued account of the model of rational agency underlying Kant’s moral philosophy.Takes a wholly new slant on Kant’s moral thought.Compares Kant’s moral philosophy with th