Titlebook: Justification and Knowledge; New Studies in Epist George Sotiros Pappas Book 1979 D. Riedel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1979 bib

spondylosis

The Need for Epistemology: Problematic Realism Defended,derstanding of the semantic, syntactic, and perhaps psychological character of statements, there will be no interesting residue of issues to be explored in terms of a concept of epistemic warrant. A second thrust is that the Gettier problem, and problems arising from the operation of social factors

Concerto

車床

0921-8599 r assistance in setting up the confer- ence; and Mary Raines and Virginia Foster for considerable aid in the pre- paration of papers and many other conference m978-90-277-1024-6978-94-009-9493-5Series ISSN 0921-8599 Series E-ISSN 2542-8349

鴕鳥

ftes erfolgen, als Zement-in-Zement-Revision bei intaktem Zementmantel oder als Imaction-grafting bei kavit?ren Defekten. Glatte sklerotische W?nde des Femur in der Wechselsituation reduzieren die Qualit?t der Interdigitation des Zementes und damit die Standzeit solcher zementierter Revisionen. Die

PLE

What is Justified Belief?,certain beliefs are counted as justified and others as unjustified. Unlike some traditional approaches, I do not try to prescribe standards for justification that differ from, or improve upon, our ordinary standards. I merely try to explicate the ordinary standards, which are, I believe, quite diffe

系列

Justification and the Basis of Belief,titute that upon which the person’s belief is ... It often happens that a person’s belief that . is based upon a set of reasons . when believing that . on the basis of . is not justified for that person. This can happen even though the person has other reasons such that if the belief had been based

大溝

labyrinth

The Gettier Problem and the Analysis of Knowledge,stating just what the problem is. It is, in my opinion, the problem of showing that a falliblistic theory of epistemic justification is possible. For, the problem arises in certain cases in which a person is justified, whether he knows it or not, in believing or accepting some false proposition whic

現(xiàn)任者

A Plethora of Epistemological Theories,swer. Epistemological theories form a complex array, and as we will see, many of them are not happily classifiable as either foundations theories or non-foundations theories. The purpose of this paper will be to exhibit some of the structure of this array of epistemological theories, and to say some

Geyser

On Justifying Nonbasic Statements by Basic-Reports,ces from what is foundational to other, nonfoundational statements. Without some such warrant only the very limited foundational statements are justified, and some form of epistemological skepticism seems reasonable. This latter is surely true if the foundation for each person is ‘Cartesian’, that i