Titlebook: Justice in Climate Policy; Distributing Climate Annick de Vries,Gijsbert Werner,Suzanne Hulscher Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2024 The Editor(s) (if applic

Anal-Canal

ession is enacted within a gendered biopolitics. Within the biomedical assemblage that connects mental health policy, service provision, research and everyday life, the gendered context of recovery remains little understood despite the recurrence and pervasiveness of depression. Rather than reducing

INCH

草率女

Distributive Justice, have divided these principles into four categories: ‘greatest utility’, ‘individual rights and freedoms’, ‘solidarity and capacity’ and ‘contribution and benefit’. We briefly discuss some important ethical and political-philosophical schools associated with these categories, and elaborate on the te

憤世嫉俗者

Distributing the Dutch Reduction Targets,n translated into sectoral reduction targets. In this chapter, we ask how the reduction targets should be distributed amongst the industrial, electricity, agriculture and land use, mobility, and built environment sectors. From a perspective of distributive justice, we ask which sectors need to reduc

奇怪

小平面

hankering

Damage After Extreme Rainfall, but also in the Caribbean territories. In this chapter, we specifically examine the damage caused by extreme rainfall, who is compensated for it, and who actually pays for it. We then consider which distributive principles we can identify in policies. We explain how other distributive justice consi

不舒服

expansive

Public Perspectives of Distribution Issues,existing research on this topic, and then present the results of our own research into public perspectives of distributive justice. A key finding is that more than three-quarters of respondents consider fair burden sharing to be important; often more important than reducing carbon emissions. However

fluoroscopy

Distributive Justice in Climate Policy,utive principles are often overlooked in policymaking. The key message therefore is that all climate policy should take the fair distribution of climate costs into account. In addition to effectiveness and legality, climate measures should also be assessed from the perspective of justice. Failure to