Titlebook: Judicial Decision-Making; Integrating Empirica Piotr Bystranowski,Bartosz Janik,Maciej Próchnicki Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

digestive-tract

書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making被引頻次




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making年度引用




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making讀者反饋




書目名稱Judicial Decision-Making讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

BOLT

Reasonableness on the Clapham Omnibus: Exploring the Outcome-Sensitive Folk Concept of ,ensitive. Consequently, the law makes a mistaken assumption as to what kind of concept of reasonableness lay jurors will apply in court. This conceptual misalignment, it is argued, could lead to serious injustice in US trials.

領(lǐng)帶

Book 2022ence in law. In closing, it offers empirically-driven guidance on ways to improve the quality of legal reasoning..Chapter “The Challenges of Artificial Judicial Decision-Making for Liberal Democracy” is available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com.?.

死亡

黃油沒有

愛社交

Introduction: Judging Is Human,Judging is fundamentally a human endeavor. It requires a mix of dispassionate application of rules leavened with a measures of empathy. As such, judicial decision making inevitably will be prone to biases and mistakes. This book explores the strengths and weaknesses of our inevitable reliance on human beings as judges.

扔掉掐死你

insecticide

Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarshiphttp://image.papertrans.cn/j/image/501399.jpg

領(lǐng)帶

最初