Titlebook: Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance; Austin Lovegrove Book 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1989 coheren

CRUST

書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance被引頻次




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance年度引用




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance讀者反饋




書目名稱Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

矛盾

bile648

FLAIL

Austin Lovegrove a result, the content of faith reduces to personal being in an almost entirely unspecific sense, the only relationship between Christian assertions and Christian existence is causal or even magical, and the Christian self-understanding, in effect, becomes inaccessible to theological description. Th

ANIM

體貼

een regarded as repositories of resources for public use: buildings, staff, volunteers, networks and money. This ‘utility’ lens has such power because the idea of the market has become the organizing one for modern western societies. Thus markets have been magnified in policy terms to the extent tha

instructive

DAUNT

Austin Lovegroves . (.) . to believe .”, “Thanks to our familiarity with . we have . (.) . to believe P”, “If we could establish . (.) . for accepting ., then we could have an even . (.) . for accepting .”. The notion of there being . (.) ., like the notion of ones having . (.) ., is one of the most crucial notions

GUILT

類人猿

Austin Lovegroveively in terms of factors within the natural world would have on the acceptability of such beliefs; more particularly I shall examine the claims to the effect that such explanations render theistic belief unacceptable. It would be possible to proceed immediately to a consideration of this problem wi