Titlebook: Judgment Aggregation; A Primer Davide Grossi,Gabriella Pigozzi Book 2014 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2014

SEED

模仿

挖掘

Judgment Aggregation978-3-031-01568-7Series ISSN 1939-4608 Series E-ISSN 1939-4616

吞噬

自然環(huán)境

Book 2014connected issues of interest can, or cannot, be aggregated into one collective stance. Aggregation problems have traditionally been of interest for disciplines like economics and the political sciences, as well as philosophy, where judgment aggregation itself originates from, but have recently captu

conservative

1939-4608 ally interconnected issues of interest can, or cannot, be aggregated into one collective stance. Aggregation problems have traditionally been of interest for disciplines like economics and the political sciences, as well as philosophy, where judgment aggregation itself originates from, but have rece

LAIR

Logic Meets Social Choice Theory,eference aggregation and then introduce and motivate the more recent field of judgment aggregation. The chapter builds on [Sen99, Sen86, Bla58] for the historical overview on social choice theory, and on [KS93, Kor92] for the informal introduction to judgment aggregation.

PAGAN

打火石

Impossibility,ed . Aggregation conditions are chosen as axioms in an attempt to restrict the set of possible aggregation procedures to a few desirable ones. The axiomatic method is the most influential methodological tool of social choice theory since Arrow’s theorem [Arr50], and the chapter showcases its application to judgment aggregation.

sebaceous-gland

Manipulability,ncealing her true judgment set and submitting an aptly modified one? This is, in a nutshell, the issue of the . of judgment aggregation and it is the topic of the present chapter. We will study (non-)manipulability as a property of aggregation functions and explore the effects that such a property has on the process of aggregation.