Titlebook: Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic; Maria van der Schaar Book 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Bolzano and

能得到

Judgement and the Epistemic Foundation of Logic978-94-007-5137-8Series ISSN 2214-9775 Series E-ISSN 2214-9783

Gorilla

蔑視

Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Sciencehttp://image.papertrans.cn/j/image/501375.jpg

milligram

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5137-8Bolzano and analytic truth; Bolzano and conceptual truth; Brentano on states of affairs; Conception of

自作多情

Detoxification

格子架

Containment and Variation; Two Strands in the Development of Analyticity from Aristotle to Martin-L?or ‘sentence’, or ‘statement’, (one did not overly distinguish these notions) was repeatedly treated of by excellent teachers and colleagues. There were . of Quine and experts on Kant among them, but no names, no pack-drill! If there was one central topic in traditional epistemology on which I felt

stroke

Descartes’ Theory of Judgement: Warranted Assertions, the Key to Sciencet the reason why judgement is all-pervasive in Descartes’ work has not been elucidated. This is the issue at stake in the present study of the nature and the function of the concept of judgement in the ., a text Descartes is likely to have been working on from 1618 to 1628 and which was not publishe

充滿人

organism

The Role of Wolff’s Analysis of Judgements in Kant’s Inaugural Dissertationis due to the central place they granted to the notion of judgement. Ignoring the details, they considered a judgement to be made when two concepts or representations are united .. This aspect, already present in Wolff, comes more to the fore in the philosophy of Kant. Nevertheless, both also adopte