Titlebook: John Keats; Reimagining History William A. Ulmer Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Poetry.Romanticism.Regency.

欲望小妹

History and Vocation in , (1817),es on . (1817), first, for Keats’s gestures of poetic self-validation, especially his presentation of himself as the heir to a vocationally legitimating tradition; and secondly, for the volume’s coterie aspect, as extended by Keats’s historicism beyond Hampstead to a broader community of supportive

Morose

PARA

,Keats’s Medieval Romances,flown sentimentality of Hunt’s .; and in . he conversely presents lovers skilled at adapting inherited conventions to modern needs. Departing from interpretations premised on Stillinger’s classic argument, the book rejects the rake and his victim to emphasize Porphyro and Madeline mutually construct

gonioscopy

Beauty and Truth in Regency Britain,truth” as hallmarks of artistic accomplishment. This redefined historical context allows for an interpretation of “Grecian Urn” that demotes readings stressing the text’s ironic conclusion: the urn, construed as a dramatic character, is generalizing merely about the “now” of aesthetic experience. Re

松軟無力

Secularism and Consolation in Three Odes,hese lyric meditations unfold as exercises in secular consolation. Despite recent claims to the contrary, “Ode to Psyche” does not conceive the goddess as a figure of the immortal soul. From its dramatic opening, “Ode to a Nightingale” reveals ideal havens to be metaleptic projections born of human

下級(jí)

High Tragedy in the Hyperion Project,ordsworth’s prior appropriation of Milton in the “Prospectus,” and shows Keats rejecting the notion of recoverable paradises. As Chapter 7 proceeds, the argument dismisses Oceanus’ paean to progress for its unresponsiveness to tragic victimization, claims that Keats refers tragedy to an existential

粗魯?shù)娜?/a>

William A. UlmerPosits Keats’s historicist poetics from a culturally inflected perspective.Emphasizes the importance of Cockneyism for Keats’s career.Integrates recent scholarship on Regency Cockneyism with Chandler’

河流

乳汁

978-3-319-83656-0The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

把…比做

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47084-9Poetry; Romanticism; Regency; Historicist; Cultural History