Titlebook: Jean Améry; Beyond the Mind‘s Li Yochai Ataria,Amit Kravitz,Eli Pitcovski Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under

解決

On Historical Objectivity, the Reality of Evil and Moral Kitsch: Jean Améry as a Witness issue in light of three philosophical challenges: (a) testimony and the question of historical objectivity; (b) testimony and the reality of evil; and (c) the tension between testimony and the concept of moral kitsch, as well as the relation between testimony and the problem of the so-called univer

逗留

沉積物

Registers of Undesirability, Poetics of Detention: Jean Améry on the Jewish Exile and Behrouz Boocha of the assimilated German-speaking Jews during the war. They were dispossessed not only of their homes, citizenship, and cultural community in the present, but also of their past attachments, memories, and identifications. In my text, I discuss philosophic analyses of Améry’s exile essay and point

coagulate

The Ethics of Resentment: The Tactlessness of Jean Amérye victim toward the perpetrator of the wrong. The article first examines the way Nietzsche’s concept of ressentiment is turned on its head. Secondly, it uncovers the surprising similarity of Améry’s view to P. F. Strawson’s theory of reactive attitudes in moral theory. Finally, Améry’s awareness of

隱士

Torture and Torturersemselves, with their particular psychology. Améry claims that the torture was done by people fully intent on inflicting pain, rather than by mere “bureaucrats of torture”, as some might argue. This description is important for two reasons. First, it is important for understanding the act of torture

莎草

narcotic

Total Destruction: The Case of Jean Améryis paper, relying largely on Améry’s own words, investigates this statement and seeks to provide it with a more concrete basis in phenomenology and embodied cognition. In particular, it demonstrates that torture destroys the most basic structure of the human being.

舉止粗野的人

責(zé)怪

myelography