找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate; The Relation Between Lior Nitzan Book 2014 Springer Interna

[復制鏈接]
查看: 23410|回復: 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:26:41 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate
副標題The Relation Between
編輯Lior Nitzan
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/501/500120/500120.mp4
概述Presents a radically new way of understanding Kant’s transcendental idealism.Reconstructs, step by step, the historical development of Beck’s Doctrine of the Standpoint and contrasts Beck‘s views with
叢書名稱Studies in German Idealism
圖書封面Titlebook: Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate; The Relation Between Lior Nitzan Book 2014 Springer Interna
描述.This book examines the unique views of philosopher Jacob Sigismund Beck, a student of Immanuel Kant who devoted himself to an exploration of his teacher‘s doctrine and to showing that Kant’s transcendental idealism is, contra to the common view, both internally consistent and is not a form of subjective idealism. In his attempt to explain away certain apparent contradictions found in Kant‘s system, Beck put forward a new reading of Kant’s critical theory, a view, which came to be known as the .Standpunctslehre, the .Doctrine of the Standpoint..Author Lior Nitzan reconstructs, step by step, the historical development of Beck’s doctrine. He shows how Beck‘s unique view is drastically different from that of his contemporaries and presents the relevance of Beck to contemporary debates about the proper interpretation of Kant’s notion of objectivity, the refutation of idealism and the role of the thing in itself in Kant’s transcendental idealism. In doing so, Nitzan presents a defense of Beck‘s radical perspective of Kant’s theory and claims that some of Kant’s negative responses to it may in fact be due more to the adversary academic environment at the time than to Kant’s true, well co
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞Concept of Object; German Idealism; Immanuel Kant; J; G; Fichte; Jacob Sigismund Beck; K; L; Reinhold; Ont
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05984-6
isbn_softcover978-3-319-34758-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-05984-6Series ISSN 1571-4764 Series E-ISSN 2542-9868
issn_series 1571-4764
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate被引頻次




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate年度引用




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate讀者反饋




書目名稱Jacob Sigismund Beck’s Standpunctslehre and the Kantian Thing-in-itself Debate讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:46:50 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:20:09 | 只看該作者
The Development of Beck’s Thought, Leading Up to the Publication of the ,t – the . – was published. This chapter, thus, follows both the systematic development of Beck’s views as well as the historical unfolding of events, which led to the publication of his major work. The discussion in this chapter comprises the correspondence between Kant and Beck during the period in
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:22:33 | 只看該作者
The Problem of the Bond Between a Representation and Its Objection whether a particular representation has or has not an object already . that . such questions can be asked. What is presupposed is that in general representations . objects. However, this very presupposition seems to be ungrounded. As Beck notes, it is not even clear what we mean by ‘a(chǎn)n object’.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:26:45 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:18:09 | 只看該作者
The Highest Principle of Philosophy – The Postulate to Represent Originallyis the postulate to represent originally. In order to explain the meaning of original representing, Beck gives the example of the geometer. When the latter is asked to explain the three-dimensionality of space, he does not appeal to conceptual arguments and definitions but simply requires that one r
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:16:32 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:15:11 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:09:01 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:00:55 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 04:01
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
孝义市| 明光市| 花莲市| 海门市| 沾化县| 德令哈市| 宁陕县| 迁西县| 汉沽区| 库伦旗| 信宜市| 利川市| 荣成市| 舟山市| 邵阳市| 白山市| 定西市| 宁都县| 宿松县| 永丰县| 石林| 安平县| 瑞昌市| 达日县| 禹州市| 镇赉县| 龙川县| 休宁县| 新晃| 平乐县| 唐海县| 恩平市| 威海市| 隆尧县| 枣强县| 高台县| 包头市| 岳西县| 广丰县| 天峻县| 肇州县|