Titlebook: J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression; A Reconsideration of Alexandra Effe Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and Th

Collar

J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression978-3-319-60101-4

agonist

Conclusion,The conclusion emphasizes that Coetzee’s oeuvre calls for a revised understanding of self-reflexivity and metalepsis, and ends on the implications of such a reconsideration for our practice as critics and readers.

sultry

ELUC

Perennial長期的

LEVY

accordance

ld, such as Clarkson, Hayes, Attwell and Attridge.Combines tThis book is about the metanarrative and metafictional elements of J. M. Coetzee’s novels. It draws together authorship, readership, ethics, and formal analysis into one overarching argument about how narratives work the boundary between ar

Nerve-Block

圣人

Author and Reader: Communication, Creation, and Care,er,” and ., where Mrs. Curren is a forerunner), is shown to be in a state of limbo, subject to uncertainties in writing and reading. She functions to allow Coetzee to speak without claiming authority and to extend responsibility to the reader for the challenges that surrogates and author face.

Hla461

Book 2017l analysis into one overarching argument about how narratives work the boundary between art and life. On the basis of Coetzee’s writing, it reconsiders the concept of metalepsis, challenges common understandings of self-reflexive discourse, and invites us to rethink our practice as critics and reade