Titlebook: Italian Sociology,1945–2010; An Intellectual and Andrea Cossu,Matteo Bortolini Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

Enervate

frozen-shoulder

預防注射

Myths and Histories of Italian Sociology,infrastructures for practicing sociology as an academic discipline. The chapter questions existing disciplinary memory about the ‘rebirth’ of Italian sociology after the Second World War and describes the typical features of early positivistic debates and the role of statistician Corrado Gini and hi

倔強不能

,The Post-war Period: ‘Inventing’ Sociology in Italy,r kind of rational, empirically based knowledge aimed at orienting policy decisions. As a result, early post-war sociology emerged as a Janus-faced discipline: Young would-be sociologists had to differentiate their practices from the humanities and sociology as it was understood by statisticians. At

Countermand

Dissonance

The Dream of Institutionalization,r a brief description of the Italian centralized-but-fragmented ‘chair system,’ the chapter describes the emergence of a new generation of sociologists, properly trained in research institutes and much more professionalized than their teachers and academic patrons. The 1960s were also the time for a

coagulation

A Fascinating and Precarious Project: Sociology in Trento,tion of sociology in Italy. The Istituto Universitario Superiore di Scienze Sociali was established in Trento in 1962 thanks to the visionary drive of Christian Democratic politician Bruno Kessler. The process involved local and nationwide networks of politicians and social scientists, the elaborati

critique

,After ’68: A New Generation of Sociologists, for the first time, a massive dosage of Marxism into Italian sociology. Many young sociologists developed a new style of ‘co-research’ based on a radical critique of Italian modernization. At the same time, the emergence of ‘mass university’ helped them find a quick pathway to tenured jobs within t

一再困擾

Entrenchment and the Emergence of New Structures,s as two loosely defined ‘Catholic’ and ‘lay’ camps. The first group coalesced around Achille Ardigò, while the lay camp assumed a more polycentric, fragmented pattern. Membership would influence almost every aspect of a sociologist’s scholarly and academic career. In time, the camps grew increasing

野蠻