Titlebook: Is Science Sexist?; And Other Problems i Michael Ruse Book 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1981 Karl R. Popper.evolut

sparse

Karl Popper and Evolutionary Biology,to acknowledge rank and importance, from Nobel Prizes down through membership in prestigious bodies (like the Royal Society) to medals awarded by small specialist organizations (the Douglas Medal awarded by the American Society for Testing and Materials). Informally also, when two or three scientist

委屈

The Last Word on Teleology, or Optimality Models Vindicated,he . of the heart is to pump the blood”, or that “the heart exists . pump the blood”. This ‘teleological’ dimension to biology attracts a great deal of attention from philosophers, although those of us with nasty minds suspect that the essence of the attraction does not really lie in the topic itsel

不連貫

The Molecular Revolution in Genetics, interest” (Watson and Crick, 1953, p. 737). This brief paragraph begins what is probably the most famous biological paper of this century; what is indeed possibly the most famous paper since those of Mendel in the 1860s or even the Darwin—Wallace papers announcing natural selection, read before the

nurture

一起

凝乳

縮減了

Is Science Sexist? The Case of Sociobiology,sense. They feel that the person asking it is committing what we philosophers have learned to call a ‘category mistake’ (Ryle, 1949). Asking whether science is sexist is a bit like asking whether or not Tuesday is tired. It is not false, or true, that Tuesday is tired. It is simply that Tuesdays are

mitral-valve

泥土謙卑

Calibrate

Paul Streetenskussion dieses Zusammenhangs seit der Antike vor: So haben sich bekanntlich sowohl Platon als auch Aristoteles und Horaz mit dieser Frage besch?ftigt. Sie nehmen zwar verschiedene Akzentuierungen vor, stehen sich jedoch darin nahe, da? sie eine enge Beziehung zwischen Dichtung und Gefühlen, genauer