Titlebook: Is Science Sexist?; And Other Problems i Michael Ruse Book 1981 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1981 Karl R. Popper.evolut

raff淫雨霏霏

書目名稱Is Science Sexist?影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?被引頻次




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?年度引用




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?讀者反饋




書目名稱Is Science Sexist?讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

摘要記錄

Karl Popper and Evolutionary Biology,m Huxley was to clash in such dramatic fashion in 1860 at the British Association’s debate on human origins, Richard Owen! Darwin, I am afraid, came very much down the list — although to do a justice to Huxley, which he would probably not appreciate, in 1851, on the basis of published work, he was quite right to rate Owen far above Darwin.

舊式步槍

1566-659X oes back to the Greeks. However, until recently in this century, it was sadly neglected. With a few noteworthy exceptions, someone wishing to delve into the subject had to choose between extremes of insipid vitalism on the one hand, and sterile formalizations of the most elementary biological princi

Ornament

Book 1981o the Greeks. However, until recently in this century, it was sadly neglected. With a few noteworthy exceptions, someone wishing to delve into the subject had to choose between extremes of insipid vitalism on the one hand, and sterile formalizations of the most elementary biological principles on th

PATHY

The Evidence for Evolutionary Theory,thetic theory simply a grandiose exercise in system building, the castle in the sky to end all castles in the sky, or can it command our respect as a reasonably well-confirmed theory? Is it fact or is it fiction?

MOT

Adherent

conformity

Book 1981 con- strained to stay only with theoretical parts of biology, but can range over to more medical parts of the spectrum. At the same time, biology itself has had one of the most fruitful yet turbulent periods in its whole history, and more and more biologists have grown to see that many of the probl

KIN

The Last Word on Teleology, or Optimality Models Vindicated,one can cheerfully move the discussion into the unreal world of the imagination so beloved by philosophers. Biology forgotten, one can talk about door knobs serving as paper weights, sewing machines with buttons to be pressed when one wants them to self-destruct, multi-purposed water beds, or whatev

Misgiving

The Molecular Revolution in Genetics,olecular basis of heredity. As Watson and Crick laconically remarked at the conclusion of their paper: “It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material” (ibid.). Thus started the molecular revolutio