Titlebook: Irrigated Agriculture in Egypt; Past, Present and Fu Masayoshi Satoh,Samir Aboulroos Book 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerla

FID

R. M. M. El-Kilani,M. Sugitaablish that there is something inherently objectionable about paternalistic interference. If any such argument is successful against epistemic paternalism, such paternalism is not a viable option in our attempts to come to terms with our dual tendency for bias and overconfidence, no matter how convi

Chronic

A. Kubota,B. Zayed,H. Fujimaki,T. Higashi,S. Yoshida,M. M. A. Mahmoud,Y. Kitamura,W. H. Abou El Hassablish that there is something inherently objectionable about paternalistic interference. If any such argument is successful against epistemic paternalism, such paternalism is not a viable option in our attempts to come to terms with our dual tendency for bias and overconfidence, no matter how convi

ETCH

托運

S. Maruyama,S. M. M. Shebl,K. I. Abdel-Gawad,A. Kubota,K. Shimizu,N. Ishikawa,A. E. D. H. Mohameddorses constitutivism with respect to first-personal self-knowledge and defends it from the . devastating objection of rendering it a misnomer to call that kind of self-. thus. Moreover, it embraces methodological pluralism with respect to third-personal self-knowledge and draws attention to the epi

TIA742

A. T. Elbendary,M. Nawar,S. Matsushitahe locality of rational evaluation (in conjunction with a reasonable appreciation of epistemic diversity) commits the Wittgenstenian to a further epistemic incommensurability thesis. Next, Duncan Pritchard’s (e.g. 2009; 2015) novel attempt to save the hinge epistemologist from a commitment to episte

剛開始

偏見

Chronological

l yield different results. Epistemic evaluation, however, involves epistemic standards and appropriate epistemic goals. A theory of epistemic justification must therefore address the question of the aim and objective of epistemic justification, that is, what is the point of epistemic justification a

chemoprevention

incision

A. Kubota,B. Zayed,H. Fujimaki,T. Higashi,S. Yoshida,M. M. A. Mahmoud,Y. Kitamura,W. H. Abou El Hassue. That, I have argued, is what epistemic paternalism is. Moreover, I suggested towards the end of Chapter 2 that it is not part of its definition that there is anything objectionable about epistemic paternalism. But by the same logic, it also is not part of the definition that practising epistemic