Titlebook: Iraqi Kurds and Nation-Building; Mohammed M. A. Ahmed Book 2012 Mohammed M. A. Ahmed 2012 democracy.Europe.government.Iraq.parliament

背帶

Kurdish Leadership Style and Internal Disputes,the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP), stand almost shoulder to shoulder to defend the Kurdish issue. While Talabani is described as a liberal and Massoud Barzani as a conservative, both stand accused by the Gorran Party leadership of turning the

瑪瑙

outer-ear

Evolving Ties with the United States and Europe,rating statesmanship, diplomatic skills, and reliability as peacemakers between Sunni and Shiite Arabs in order to maintain Iraq’s unity. The Kurds were quick to acquire the necessary political and diplomatic skills to administer their autonomous region, consisting of Arbil, Sulaimaniya, and Duhok.

粘

Democracy or Lack of It,Baghdad, suddenly felt like outsiders on their own soil. Kurdish leaders seemed to have forgotten they were the trustees of their people and not owners of Kurdistan’s rising political and economic fortunes during 1991–2012. Many Kurds wondered how their top guns became so wealthy so quickly while th

cortisol

and Disputed Kurdish Territories,ate the northern provinces of Kirkuk, Nineveh, Salahadin, and Diyala from Iraq’s army and helped fighting the Sunni Arab insurgency in the center. Yet the US army and diplomatic corps and Iraqi Arab opposition tried to dismantle the . organization by bringing it under central government control. Sin

賄賂

Military Standoff in Disputed Areas,nsed and settled by Arabs from other parts of Iraq and annexed to the neighboring provinces of Ta’amim, Nineveh, Diyala, and Salahadin. Arabization of Kurdish territories started following the creation of modern Iraq in the 1920s, when the Arab-dominated governments in Baghdad pushed north in order

善于騙人

,Resistance to Ankara’s Pressure to Fight the PKK,ear among the Kurds that the United States might once again sell them out to Arabs and Turks in order to advance its own national interests. The United States had reached a juncture in the Iraq War to rearrange the balance of power between Sunni Arabs, Shiites, and Kurds. Both Iraqi Arabs and neighb

Adulate

,Shift in Turkey’s Narrative toward Iraqi Kurds,e in early 2008. Pundits noted that during their meeting in the White House, Bush must have given Turkey’s Gul carte blanche to pursue his country’s security and commercial interests in Iraq, conditional on not destabilizing the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)-administered region in the north. S

Addictive

Future Prospects of the KRG,ions were still at loggerheads in early 2012, while the Kurds enjoyed a large degree of autonomy and economic prosperity. Two years after the March 2010 elections and after the last U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq, three security cabinet posts were still vacant in May 2012, and the government was un

聲明