Titlebook: Iranian Foreign Policy during Ahmadinejad; Ideology and Actions Maaike Warnaar Book 2013 Maaike Warnaar 2013 foreign policy.Policy.revoluti

Halfhearted

t understood in the context of the regime‘s foreign policy ideology, which is rooted in a conception of Iran as a nation changed by the 1979 Revolution and an example to other nations in a changing world.978-1-349-46389-3978-1-137-33791-7

Counteract

Studying Iranian Foreign Policy: A Constructivist Approach,ielded have proven invaluable in the understanding of the “how possible” of Iranian foreign policy. This chapter traces back the steps of the constructivist approach that forms the backbone of this book.

SUGAR

Foreign Threat and Political Repression,t by reversing them, justifying repression against protestors and activists. It discursively tied the opposition movement to outside interference, branded it alien, and it restated the democratic character of the Iranian state and the support of the Iranian people for the Islamic system.

誘拐

Introduction,of the Taliban and Saddam regimes had created new options for Iran, and during the early years of Ahmadinejad’spresidency, relations with Arab states seemed on the mend. The Syrian civil war, however, highlighted regional differences, narrowing the Islamic Republic’s regional possibilities. Despite

–FER

拱墻

International Legitimacy: Constraints and Opportunities,d from 2006 to 2013, the United States and its European allies severely limited the Iranian regime’s international options. Their questioning of the Iranian regime’s international legitimacy became institutionally embedded in an international sanctions regime, which greatly restricted trade relation

從容

A Foreign Policy Ideology of Change,ments’ by President Ahmadinejad and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.. It shows how the identification of problems and solutions, juxtapositions of good and evil, narratives of the past, and expectations for the future in the regime’s foreign policy ideology contributed to an elaborate and inherently con

語源學

,Iranian Foreign Policy Behavior 2005–2013,ussia added to the intricacies of the global system, but did not prevent Western global domination. After the events of September 11, 2001, the United States pursued unilateralism in an even more determined way, Mottaki explained. When the Iranian reformist government initiated a dialogue with the W

Limpid

令人心醉

Conclusion, pressure on Iran during Ahmadinejad’s presidency increased and confirmed the regime’s perspective on international developments. Through its foreign policy of resistance and its efforts to increase South—South cooperation, the Iranian regime tried to use its marginalization at the hands of the West