Titlebook: Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth; The Role of Brouwer’ Enrico Martino Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG 2018 Inform

FAD

書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth被引頻次




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth年度引用




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth讀者反饋




書目名稱Intuitionistic Proof Versus Classical Truth讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

袖章

原諒

Connection Between the Principle of Inductive Evidence and the Bar Theorem,xplaining it properly. Therefore, I shall present here a more adequate treatment of the connection between . and .. In fact, I shall assume acquaintance with Sects.?. and Theorem . of CS and provide a revised version of Theorem ..

大洪水

行為

MUMP

Negationless Intuitionism,or such semantics, strong completeness is restorable. We argue that lawless negationless semantics is a suitable framework for a constructive . interpretation of any second-order formalisable theory (classical or intuitionistic, contradictory or not).

切割

微塵

卷發(fā)

set598

Negationless Intuitionism,mpleteness of full first-order logic fails. We then consider a .à la. for second-order intuitionistic logic. By using the theory of . we prove that, for such semantics, strong completeness is restorable. We argue that lawless negationless semantics is a suitable framework for a constructive . interp