找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: International Public Health Policy and Ethics; Michael Boylan Book 2023Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), und

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 生手
41#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 17:48:21 | 只看該作者
42#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 20:15:13 | 只看該作者
Health Care Justice: The Social Insurance Approachal right to health care services requires a single-payer, government-run, national health care system. The social insurance model of Germany, France, Japan, and many other countries, deserves more attention, as it incorporates the strengths of both market models and national health care models.
43#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 02:58:08 | 只看該作者
44#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 03:13:22 | 只看該作者
International Health Inequalities and Global Justiceer, we must carry out the task of explaining the substance of international obligations for the various kinds of cooperative schemes, international agencies, and international rule-making bodies in order to specify when the internationally socially controllable factors affecting health are justly distributed and regulated.
45#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 09:45:19 | 只看該作者
Exploring the Philosophical Foundations of the Human Rights Approach to International Public Health ture of moral rights can help respond to the criticism that certain rights underpinning the human rights approach to public health ethics, such as the right to health, cannot be justified. Finally, I argue that the human rights approach to public health ethics promises to contribute to our understanding of both health and human rights.
46#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 14:48:05 | 只看該作者
47#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 19:29:28 | 只看該作者
48#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-29 20:11:34 | 只看該作者
2662-9186 ng with COVID and public health issues in Africa.The only bo.This second edition of .International Public Health Policy and Ethics .complements the popular first edition with contemporary problems in international public health. It brings together philosophers and practitioners to address the founda
49#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 02:09:13 | 只看該作者
Personal or Public Health? have for allocating resources to rescue interventions. If these reasons do not provide adequate justification for preferring these types of interventions, then the implication is that our current mode of resource allocation may need to be revised in favour of a more public health-oriented model.
50#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 06:56:22 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-19 23:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
沽源县| 新津县| 泾阳县| 翼城县| 城步| 德阳市| 奇台县| 昆山市| 上饶市| 新平| 轮台县| 安乡县| 彭山县| 潮安县| 桦甸市| 当雄县| 上杭县| 拉孜县| 桐庐县| 遵义县| 右玉县| 得荣县| 康保县| 兴化市| 邹平县| 甘德县| 天长市| 黎平县| 沧源| 体育| 霍州市| 长泰县| 石渠县| 潼南县| 高陵县| 江达县| 永登县| 乌拉特中旗| 鄯善县| 柞水县| 永胜县|