找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: International Law and Japanese Sovereignty; The Emerging Global Douglas Howland Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 46374|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:07:16 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty
副標(biāo)題The Emerging Global
編輯Douglas Howland
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/472/471750/471750.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: International Law and Japanese Sovereignty; The Emerging Global  Douglas Howland Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
描述.How does a nation become a great power?A global order was emerging in the nineteenth century, one in which all nations were included. This book explores the multiple legal grounds of Meiji Japan‘s assertion of sovereign statehood within that order: natural law, treaty law, international administrative law, and the laws of war. Contrary to arguments that Japan was victimized by ‘unequal‘ treaties, or that Japan was required to meet a ‘standard of civilization‘ before it could participate in international society, Howland argues that the Westernizing Japanese state was a player from the start. In the midst of contradictions between law and imperialism, Japan expressed state will and legal acumen as an equal of the Western powers – international incidents in Japanese waters, disputes with foreign powers on Japanese territory, and the prosecution of interstate war. As a member of international administrative unions, Japan worked with fellow members to manage technical systems such asthe telegraph and the post. As a member of organizations such as the International Law Association and as a leader at the Hague Peace Conferences, Japan helped to expand international law. By 1907, Japan w
出版日期Book 2016
關(guān)鍵詞Japanese history; great powers; international society; state sovereignty; International law; great powers
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56777-2
isbn_ebook978-1-137-56777-2
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty年度引用




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱International Law and Japanese Sovereignty讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:35:44 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-56777-2Japanese history; great powers; international society; state sovereignty; International law; great powers
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:30:10 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:47:45 | 只看該作者
Book 2016res the multiple legal grounds of Meiji Japan‘s assertion of sovereign statehood within that order: natural law, treaty law, international administrative law, and the laws of war. Contrary to arguments that Japan was victimized by ‘unequal‘ treaties, or that Japan was required to meet a ‘standard of
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:27:49 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:56:09 | 只看該作者
International Legal Grounds for State Sovereignty,ernational relations, and the fitfulness of treaty revision conferences, Japan was neither victim nor fool but engaged all three forms of international law as it asserted its sovereignty and achieved parity with the great powers.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:28:28 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:51:43 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:45:12 | 只看該作者
The Alternative Order of International Administration,iated with state sovereignty was confirmed as an extension of international administrative law, and Japan’s membership in some of these unions supported Japanese sovereign claims over the administration of technical systems within its territory.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:01:01 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-25 07:21
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
长岭县| 会同县| 兰考县| 陇南市| 彭山县| 合山市| 佛山市| 闻喜县| 江口县| 大同市| 镇巴县| 木兰县| 永兴县| 沙河市| 盈江县| 黄梅县| 民权县| 浑源县| 临邑县| 临西县| 双牌县| 固原市| 株洲县| 舒兰市| 彭泽县| 潞西市| 大邑县| 德庆县| 姜堰市| 东源县| 宣武区| 灵璧县| 新昌县| 邢台市| 沈丘县| 荃湾区| 旅游| 吕梁市| 南召县| 曲周县| 雅江县|