找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics; Dialogue, Rationalit Manuel Rebuschi,Martine Batt,Alain Trognon

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 6868|回復(fù): 54
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:15:10 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics
副標(biāo)題Dialogue, Rationalit
編輯Manuel Rebuschi,Martine Batt,Alain Trognon
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/471/470830/470830.mp4
概述Builds on the interdisciplinary scientific project, DiaRaFor (“Dialogue, Rationality, Formalisms”).Examines meeting points between different disciplines including logic and the social sciences and off
叢書名稱Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning
圖書封面Titlebook: Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics; Dialogue, Rationalit Manuel Rebuschi,Martine Batt,Alain Trognon
描述.This book presents comparisons of recent accounts in the formalization of natural language (dynamic logics and formal semantics) with informal conceptions of interaction (dialogue, natural logic and attribution of rationality) that have been developed in both psychology and epistemology. There are four parts which explore: historical and systematic studies; the formalization of context in epistemology; the formalization of reasoning in interactive contexts in psychology; the formalization of pathological conversations..Part one discusses the Erlangen School, which proposed a logical analysis of science as well as an operational reconstruction of psychological concepts. These first chapters provide epistemological and psychological insights into a conceptual reassessment of rational reconstruction from a pragmatic point of view..The second focus is on formal epistemology, where there has recently been a vigorous contribution from experts in epistemic and doxatic logics and an attempt to account for a more realistic, cognitively plausible conception of knowledge..The third part of this book examines the meeting point between logic and the human and social sciences and the fourth par
出版日期Book 2014
關(guān)鍵詞Conversation, Pathology, Formalization; Dialogue and Calculation; Discourse in Schizophrenic Disorders
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03044-9
isbn_softcover978-3-319-35314-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-03044-9Series ISSN 2214-9120 Series E-ISSN 2214-9139
issn_series 2214-9120
copyrightSpringer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics被引頻次




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics年度引用




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics讀者反饋




書目名稱Interdisciplinary Works in Logic, Epistemology, Psychology and Linguistics讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:07:14 | 只看該作者
Geometry as a Measurement-Theoretical A Priori: Lorenzen’s Defense of Relativity Against the Ontologth Poincaré, but offers a constructive account: space is not an empirical entity described by means of conventions, but a purely constructive entity constituted by the norms of spatial measurement. This space however, as Lorenzen argues, is Euclidean. In this paper, we shall analyse Lorenzen argumen
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:01:47 | 只看該作者
Correspondence Between Evert Willem Beth and Jean Piaget (1951–1955)gy has more or less abandoned his references to classical logic in order to theorize its experimental results. Finally, the demand for collaboration between the two disciplines is becoming more and more up to date, without to be realized. As part of an effort to understand the scope of such cooperat
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:41:20 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:38:23 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:54:40 | 只看該作者
Reasoning About Knowledge in Contextetween knowledge and context. Based on the notion of “contextual models”!contextual , a first section on “static formalism” will make it possible to capture using the same language and the same semantics, a number of epistemological positions amongst those most prominent in the recent philosophical
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:15:17 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:02:48 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:25:41 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:25:56 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 07:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
嘉义县| 洞口县| 依兰县| 多伦县| 喀什市| 行唐县| 大余县| 武陟县| 陈巴尔虎旗| 金门县| 洮南市| 呼和浩特市| 普兰店市| 大姚县| 通河县| 富平县| 自贡市| 东明县| 昆山市| 东丽区| 铜川市| 高密市| 娄烦县| 丁青县| 修水县| 灌南县| 浪卡子县| 兴仁县| 玉山县| 抚松县| 阳谷县| 岳普湖县| 萨迦县| 长宁区| 福泉市| 公主岭市| 日土县| 台东市| 宜都市| 独山县| 瑞丽市|