Titlebook: Interculturality in Fragments; A Reflexive Approach Fred Dervin Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive

DOTE

,‘Performing’ Interculturality: Focus on Stages and Backstages,rform identities, discourses, actions together, influenced by, e.g., multiple ideologies, political and economic elements. Such performances take place on stage, while backstage, we might retain our ‘real’ identities and beliefs. Interculturality trains us to think about how we can communicate with

繁殖

Ideologies of Interculturality: Building Up Awareness of the Predatory and Falsely Critical,y is an order passed onto us through different influential channels, without us necessarily noticing. The concepts, notions, ideas and arguments that we use to discuss interculturality are all ideological, even in the claim that they are not. Accusing others of putting forward ideologies of intercul

Carcinogen

Othering as a Problematic and Yet Indispensable Routine,te and, at times, mere performances and victims of political correctness. Blaming others for othering is a constant in intercultural research and education. Yet the fragments from this chapter remind us that we are all . and .. As such the other plays multiple functions in our everyday life. This om

allergen

Shifting the Focus: Interculturality as Change, models of intercultural competence. This chapter emphasizes the importance of considering interculturality through the prism of change and stability—a central continuum in the way we ‘do’ it together. Change occurs all the time interculturally, without us being aware of it. The chapter argues that

我要威脅

Language: The Substance of Interculturality,gh the prism of politics. Translating is central to this important issue and recommended as a starting point for discussing with the other. The same applies to etymological work, whereby we can consider words like history books and encyclopaedias and thus enrich our understanding of interculturality

paroxysm

Researching Interculturality Otherwise,out it. Several critical aspects of researching interculturality are tackled: revising the said boundary between objectivity/subjectivity; treating every situation of research as intercultural too and taking into account the centrality of co-change; listening to silences in research, i.e. .; becomin

發(fā)酵劑

Coda,lity is about humanity first and foremost; interculturality does not make us . the other but it makes us .; interculturality as an object of research and education is polymorphic and must always be considered as such; avoiding perspectives that make the notion meaningless, doxic, purely decorative a

整潔漂亮

GUISE

受人支配